Why the District Court Judge Must Recuse Herself from the Trump-J6 Case

The Swamp is even more swampy than most Americans can even imagine. It’s bad enough that President Trump is being pursued on baseless charges that are not even crimes, or that his fake show trial over January 6 will be held in a city where 94% of the votes went to Joe Biden in 2020. But he can’t even get a fair shake when it comes to some of the judges persecuting him.

District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan is the perfect example. She’s the one hearing the death penalty case against President Trump over January 6th. Special Prosecutor Jack Smith had to stretch the law so much that he charged Trump under a post-Civil War anti-KKK law that prohibits wearing disguises on the highway. (Seriously? Yes.)

 

Judge Chutkan, however, has an amazing history that the media won’t touch with a ten-foot pole. It’s not just her time on the bench that has people calling for her recusal. It’s what she did in private law practice before she became a judge.

Chutkan clearly has major conflicts of interest in hearing this case, and yet she has not recused herself from it yet.

For example, did you know that she was one of the lawyers that was directly involved in the Russia collusion hoax? It’s true.

She even represented Fusion GPS, the company that Hillary paid to invent the Russian potty dossier.

Watch as Kash Patel breaks down Chutkan’s past and the reasons why she should recuse herself immediately.


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

4 thoughts on “Why the District Court Judge Must Recuse Herself from the Trump-J6 Case”

  1. Judges Recusal should be immediate. Otherwise judge violates LAW. The facts justifying recusal are overwhelming.
    The corrupt Deep State is ” The government Gangsters”

  2. The justice system in this country has gone to hell. There is no difference between the crooked politicians and the crooked judges. They are all political minded., Depending on what party they think they can get the most out of, not which party will do the best job. It’s sad, but most of the people are the same anymore. How else could Biden have become the number 1 choice of the Democrats. The biggest wino on skid row would have done a better job.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *