Mark Zuckerberg Reveals FBI Told Facebook Hunter Biden Laptop Story was Russian Disinformation, Revealing Effort to Meddle in Election

The Hunter Biden laptop story was perhaps one of the most heavily censored news stories as big tech and mainstream media seemingly fought to protect Joe Biden’s image ahead of the 2020 presidential election – but now, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg has revealed that the FBI was behind the big push to censor it.

Rogan asked Zuckerberg about the censorship that took place surrounding the story and the social media CEO said that it was actually due to the FBI coming to some members on his team and warning that something was about to drop that they claimed would be “Russian propaganda.”

The New York Post then broke the story, which Facebook subsequently helped to cover up, alleging that it fit the FBI’s description of the so-called Russian propaganda.

 

The FBI’s efforts to hide this story reflect a clear attempt to interfere in the 2020 election by the agency, who acted to rig the election in Biden’s favor.

What’s worse, this is not even a standalone attempt by the agency to cover the story up.

Multiple whistleblowers from inside the FBI have revealed that they were barred by their superiors from investigating the Hunter Biden laptop as they were ordered to turn a blind eye to any Biden family crimes that the laptop might possess.

To learn more about just how dangerous this revelation that the FBI rigged the 2020 election is, watch the video here.


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

5 thoughts on “Mark Zuckerberg Reveals FBI Told Facebook Hunter Biden Laptop Story was Russian Disinformation, Revealing Effort to Meddle in Election”

    1. Fuckerberg paid for the voting and counting machines that could be multiplicated from Italy. He is just covering his but because people are dropping their accounts with Facebook. I don’t know how much stock China owns on Facebook.

  1. So IF WE are supposed to believe the FBI – James Comey and the FBI did not want to investigate Hillary Clinton in 2016 because it might make candidate Hillary Clinton – look bad before an election. The FBI did not want to investigate Hunter Biden – because it might make candidate Joe BIden look bad before an election. Yet the same FBI had absolutely NO PROBLEM pushing a FAKE Steele Dossier – that the FBI helped create and knew damned well was FAKE – the Steele Dossier that was paid for by Hillary Clinton – they had no problem pushing this garbage TO MAKE Candidate Trump look bad? OUR government and ALL of the damned alphabet agencies are supposed to represent and protect ALL 300,000,000 AMERICANS. The FBI obviously does not have the ability to do this – so why are they still around?

  2. At least groups like BLM and Antifa never took oaths and then backpeddled on those oaths. When someone takes and oath and then disregards that oath – their word is not worth squat. I remember a world where a man would look you in the eye – shake your hand and give you his word it was a done deal and it meant something. Hell it meant everything. In that world when a man reneged on his word he was no longer considered trustworthy by anyone. I really do miss that world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *