Reporter Asks Biden’s Press Secretary Why Migrant Kids Get In Person Learning when Americans Kids Do Not

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki earned less than flattering nicknames for her complete and utter lack of transparency when tasked with answering questions about Joe Biden’s first 100 days of failure. On this infuriating video, “Circle Back” Jen stumbles, stammers, and misleads a member of the White House Press Corp after the reporter asks a hard question the Biden frontwoman doesn’t want to answer.

It seems that the flood of migrant families and children that caused a humanitarian crisis at the southern border exceeded the maximum capacity of holding facilities and cages for kids Biden and Obama built. Now thousands are being housed in convention centers and fancy hotels rather than being turned away at the border.

And while the complete loss of control at the border doesn’t surprise anyone who follows the Biden Administration’s incoherent policies, what recently happed at the San Diego convention center has parents furious.

 

While working families were forced to shelter in place, lose jobs, and subject children to failed remote learning, Biden put migrant children ahead of America’s sons and daughters. Reports indicate that California teachers are providing in-person learning to non-citizens as American children are denied the same quality education.

When one reporter asked “lying Jen” to address this obvious disparity in education, Biden’s mouthpiece earns her many nicknames. Watch this video and witness Biden’s flunky squirm.


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

34 thoughts on “Reporter Asks Biden’s Press Secretary Why Migrant Kids Get In Person Learning when Americans Kids Do Not”

  1. She is the worse press secretary that I can ever remember. Both her and the President should leave their positions ASAP. Americans would be better served if they are OUT!

    1. Uh, why would you uh say that? Uh she’s uh so good at uh not uh answering a question. Uh… Let me uh get back uh to you on uh that uh. Yup!! She IS the worst press secretary EVER!!!

    2. These three idiots couldn’t operate a lemonade stand and lose everything in a week. These three, Biden,his 2 hos are complete fuck the American people.

    3. the press secretary is perfect because from her BS comes the real actions of the democrats. She has been perfect in showing this fake presidency is really the farce that it is.

    4. american would be better off with no president and no press secretary then these to lying pieces of garbage.

      the answer is simple: biden does not care about american kids.

  2. looks likes are rerun of three stooges .i wonder who voted them in .jen does not under stand the any thing!

  3. Just wondering. Since the teachers have not been working since early last year, why in the world do they need a. “Spring break”?

    1. all teachers are lazy. all teachers are bad at their jobs. all teachers do not like their students. all teachers are over paid.

      Vote school vouchers and all this garbage ends.

    1. no she is not uninformed. she just can not respond because the answers are unacceptable.

      Democrats do not care about you or your children.

  4. I’m so glad I leave in Miami because mine kids are in school those are the parents fouls not to fight for your kids to go back to school but Biden is most interesting in immigrant kids more than your Americans children’s there are no word to put these is crazy what the he’ll is going on in America peoples wake up and fight for your kids because these immigrants would take over plus Biden are doing these so they can rob the election again is sad so California you better get up and fight for your kids

  5. Biden is not concerting him self over Americans he a liar and dum how Americans voted for him shows how dum people are about politics need to wise up our kids should be the first to get education this is going down hill fast.

  6. ALL THE DEMORATS THAT VOTED FOR JOE BITEME BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T LIKE TRUMP’S PERSONALITY, HOW DO YOU LIKE WHAT YOUR PREZ IS DOING TO THE COUNTRY. I DIDN’T CARE THAT TRUMP’S PERSONALITY WAS A LITTLE ROUGH AT TIMES–HE DID A LOT OF GOOD THINGS. SNAP OUT OF IT YOU OUT OF TOUCH DEMORATS. LOOK WHAT YOU DID TO OUR COUNTRY BY VOTING FOR JOE BITEME.

  7. Psaki is dumber than a fence post. I will say again, she will be responsible for changing all the old jokes about dumb blondes, to dumb red heads.

  8. Democrat voters aren’t smart enough to realize what they did to the country.
    They just go by what their told to do,just a bunch of sheep being led to slaughter.
    We need another civil war to get the country back on track.

  9. Why is it that everytime Psaki comes out you expect to see her with a little table with 3 cups and a pea?

  10. I feel it is an appropriate time for the United States to have an amicable divorce. By no means am I advocating a civil war or any kind of armed conflict. I am only advocating a split that is mutually concurred to amicably. We could not afford an armed conflict, not with other nations that would be sure to take advantage of our armed conflict. The Blue liberal states look down with contempt upon the conservatives in the Red, so called, fly over states. The Red states do not care for the woke and cancel culture mentality that the Blue states espouse. A commission from the two groups could hopefully come to some agreement as to be acceptable to both sides. The differences in principles and desires have become too diverse to continue the way we are now. We could have two separate national governments, but be in accord and confederation in many ways. People and goods would be allowed to freely travel from one to the other without passports or tariffs or restraints on commerce. People in both nations would be able to vote in either for a period of say maybe five years and then decide on which they want their citizenship to be with.

    My thoughts are that the separation would be somewhat along the lines that went blue and went red the last couple of presidential elections with some adjustments. The Red mid-Atlantic coastal states up through New England and the coastal areas along the Pacific Ocean could be one nation. My initial thoughts are that the split would not be strictly on present day state boundaries. For instance, northern and western New York may go with the Red faction whereas the New York City area would go with the Blue faction. Philadelphia may also split from much of Pennsylvania. The areas around Chicago could be split from Southern Illinois as could possibly Detroit, Minneapolis and Atlanta. Eastern Oregon and Washington could, as well as some of California go to the Red contingency. The military and other entities could be divided on equitable grounds. We could have pacts between the two entities.

    The blue areas want no limits on immigration and to support illegal immigrants in numerous ways and wish to offer incentives like free health care, social security, relief checks, and free education.
    The red areas want only legal immigrants which this nation has always been among the best at absorbing.

    The blue areas want to take great measures to combat ‘global warming”. Drastically reducing the gathering of fossil fuels is their goal.
    The red areas wish to continue decreasing our carbon footprint, as we have done more than most any other nation, but do not wish to take the drastic measures that would sky rocket energy costs and drastically hurt the economy and job employment before our energy technology advances. The Red areas like to keep the energy independence that has aided our economy the last several years.

    The blue areas are pro abortion to a great extent.
    The red areas wish to limit abortions to an extent.

    The blue areas vilify much of this nation’s history, including many of the “Founding Fathers”. They say that this country has been built on and continues to be beset by “systemic racism”. I am not sure what “systemic” racism is. Does this brand me as a systemic racist?
    The Red areas do not wish yesteryears’ actions judged by today’s standards. Throughout history there was slavery throughout the world, but are we the only ones to be vilified by it? Women were not given suffrage hardly anywhere until the 19th century, but should our Founding Fathers be judged as evil because they did not send their daughters to higher education or fight for their wives to be able to vote. They believe this nation has been a great asset to the world and are proud of our heritage, ie. saving the world from tyrannical rule during WW1 and WW, the Marshall plan that helped both friends and foes recover from WWII, helping other countries improve their way of life, increasing food production, establishing democracies, etc.

    The Red States wish to keep the right to bear arms as the Second Amendment specifies.
    The Blue states wish to abolish much if not all of the Second Amendment.

    Many in the Blue states do not like the Constitution as written.
    Those in the Red states believe to follow the Constitution as is unless changed or amended in accordance with the methods set forth in the Constitution.

    The Blue areas wish to become much more socialistic.
    The Red areas are happy, with some small tweaks, with the capitalism that has made this country the envy of much of the world.

    Therefore, I believe that most in the more conservative Red areas of our country would be reluctantly happy with a split.
    There are only two reasons that I could foresee that the liberals of the Blue areas might not desire a split would be:
    1. They would wish to have the Red states help pay off the debts that the tax and spend Blue cities and states have acquired.
    2. They wish to have control of a larger area and population.

  11. Personally I think anyone who wants to live in a socialist country should just pack up and move to one. True Americans are happy here. Or would be without the democrats’ shenanigans. They talk about build back better but all I’ve ever seen a Democrat do is tear the place apart. ?

  12. She by far has to be the worst Press Secretary ever. Never has an answer, attempts to have knowledge, but she never comes through, and when the questions get tough she gets going. Now that’s a circle

  13. Circle Jerk Jen cok-suke is an ignorant SKANK who is in over her head. This is the case with the entire Cat House staff of clowns. led by Fumbling, Bumbling, Bozo Beijing Biden. All of them are a Disgrace & Embarrassment to the USA & the laughing stock of the World.

  14. I wish our elected Republicans would grow a backbone and quit cowering down to the rotten Dems that are ruining our country. THAT IS WHY WE ELECTED THEM !!!!! IF THEY don’t start pushing back and stand up to them this country as we know it will die.

  15. Her sole purpose is to stall for time while the Harris/Biden administration dismantles our country. She’s like one of Jeff Burnham’s ventriloquist dummies being controlled by someone’s hand up her backside, making her mouth and eyes move, as someone’s voice says things over and over – things like “I’ll get back to you on that.”, which she never does and never will. And it is, indeed, a comedy act. The rest of the world is laughing their heads off at us!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *