How do you rank American presidents? Do you praise Lincoln for freeing the slaves or condemn him for declaring war on America — literally. Scholars have argued endlessly on which metrics and merits are most important for presidential success. The entire debate is completely subjective, but the one thing you can trust is that the New York Times is incapable of suspending their overt bias long enough to print even a full sentence of truth.
In their latest attack on our great President, the Times has hired a large group of so called ‘political scientists’ to try and push a collective opinion that Trump, after only one year in office, is objectively the worst President in history. They never seem to learn their lessons. The “scientific consensus” argument hasn’t won them points in regards to global warming or gender fluidity. They can’t even agree on when human life begins. Yet, they use the same tactics to try and rig the system against Trump.
In this video, an actual scholar breaks down the ranking and their metrics. Watch it, and you’ll quickly see that this is a farce beyond farces.
