In an effort to try and slow down President Donald Trump and his America-saving agenda, Democrats have come up with a desperate new false narrative undermine him and the work he’s doing.
Democrats are claiming that Trump’s efforts to reform the federal government have plunged America into “constitutional crisis.”
Like any miserable leftist narrative, this idea was born from propaganda media bringing in so-called experts to make up a bunch of lies about how “Trump is bad.”
The New York Times (which was paid millions by the very institutions Trump is reforming) had a couple of far-left “legal scholars” write a hit piece on Trump which said that he had caused a “constitutional crisis,” with his “lawless” actions.
From there, other left-wing outlets (also funded by those same agencies) then began parroting the same talking point.
But something unexpected happened when one of the liberal talking heads faced some unexpected resistance from his guest who COMPLETELY DISMANTLED the B.S. narrative.
MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski read from the New York Times article and asked legal analyst Danny Cevallos for his opinion.
Rather than blindly agreeing that Trump is evil like leftists usually do, Cevallos actually pointed out that these liberal activists have no clue what they’re talking about.
Cevallos said, “I think we need to be careful with the term constitutional crisis,” adding that Trump’ actions DO NOT equate to what the New York Times and others are claiming.
He went on to say that there would only be a “constitutional crisis” if President Trump decided to “ignore the courts” which is particularly hilarious because it’s EXACTLY what Democrat President Joe Biden did when he opted to ignore Supreme Court rulings against student loan cancellations, opting to proceed with the policy anyways.
At the time, there was no hysteria from the Democrats or mainstream media talk about a constitutional crisis, despite the fact that by their own definition we LITERALLY had one.
The Democrats are pitiful. Watch the video here to see them debunk their own narrative.