Until Democrats saw the pandemic as an opportunity to expand their dictator-like policies and force people to comply with unreasonable mandates, natural immunity was widely considered superior to vaccinations. This fact was never seriously debated as the scientific community was relatively exempt from political infections and not required to regurgitate phony narratives.
Those days may be in the country’s rearview mirror, but Kim Iversen drops a bombshell report on this exclusive report Democrats want silenced.
Relying on fact-based studies conducted in Israel and other regions, Iverson turns the purely political notion that the COVID shot delivers better protection than naturally-occurring antibodies on its head. During this segment of The Hill’s bipartisan Rising, she points to long-standing data and scientific principles cited by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Examples such as chicken pox, measles, mumps and other viruses prove people are better served by contracting this type of infection and building immunities. The biological facts are that the human body creates cells that effectively anticipate future attacks by COVID and are ready to respond and eliminate the virus.
Let’s not forget that the shot is not actually a “vaccine” because it does not deliver lasting immunity or stop people who get the jab from further spreading the virus or contracting it.
The essential question revolves around why people such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of the CDC, large corporations, and Democrat politicians have rejected science. If you want to know the truth about natural immunity and the hard numbers that prove shots are inferior, Kim Iversen delivers drops a smart-bomb of facts the fake news media doesn’t want you to know.